Georgia Proposed Bicycle Legislation HB689 Meeting – What I Saw

HB689 is a bill proposed by 3 Hall County Georgia lawmakers (Rep. Carl Rogers and supported by Reps. Lee Hawkins and Emory Dunahoo, all Hall County Republicans) that would require all bicycles in the state to be tagged and registered for a $15 fee, would limit riders to 4 at a time single file with 50 feet of space between groups, and would allow authorities to deem any road they they see fit to be off limits to bicyclists.  Needless to say there is huge opposition from the cycling community. Tonight there was a public meeting about the bill which I attended.


The room packed out completely, I would estimate about 300 in attendance.  There was a brief introduction and then people from the audience were allowed 3 minutes to speak. The first speaker delicately took the side of motorists, and genuinely seemed concerned for the safety of the cyclists and herself. Then the cycling crowd began to rock the mic one by one.

The most exciting part of the meeting happened when a gentleman named Robert Wilhite spoke at length very passionately and got the crowd fired up, then was asked to stop speaking as he was over his time limit.  He tried to make his closing point but was asked again to stop, to which the assembled crowd started chanting “Let Him Speak”.  Mr. Wilhite did sit down but the crowd continued to voice their displeasure with him not being allowed to close.  Then a security gaurd stepped over to Mr Wilhite, who had sat down and was complying with the instruction to not conclude his speech.  But for some reason, as the crowd got more and more vocal, the security gaurd ended up removing Mr. Wilhite from the meeting.  I doubt he was arrested as he was complying with their demand. I hope he wasn’t anyway.

More speakers took to the mic and there were some very good points raised.  Two speakers actually raised the point that I had hoped for all along, which was that we as cyclists need to realize that we aren’t always setting the best example, and that there are loads of cyclists out there who take the “Share the Road” mentality to mean that they can just ride however they want to and motorists should deal with it.  This is a horrible attitude and does not promote a sharing atmosphere at all.  Examples were given about how cyclists could be more courteous and also how their actions could be interpreted as smug and defiant.  It was great when someone pointed out that almost every cyclist in the room was ALSO a motorist and that we have all witnessed bad form by cyclists when driving.  You may not like that but it is true.  Each commentor that brought this up left the room with words of encouragement to NOT be that kind of cyclist as it ends up contributing to the polarizing effect.

One of my favorite speeches of the night was by a lady who I believe represented a tourism organization in Lumpkin County. She made excellent use of her time by providing examples of how fantastic the Six Gap ride is to Lumpkin County financially, citing 2600 riders in attendance from 31 states. Then explained that since this legislation has been introduced that she has been fielding messages from out of state participants who are concerned that they’ll have to tag thier bike in order to participate in the ride at risk of being ticketed. It really made an impact on the room when the issue got down to losing dollars because of legislation that was not well thought out.

The speech with the most impact though, happened early on in the meeting.  A man used a visual aid to illustrate the group ride that he was in this past weekend which had 32 riders riding 2 abreast.  The length of the entire group was 111ft, a manageable length for a car to pass providing the road allowed for it to be done safely.  Then, with the help of another participant, he brought out a visual aid of that same ride adhering to the specs of the bill…no more than 4 riders to a group with 50 ft between each group. People started applauding as the visual aid kept unrolling and unrolling, eventually stretching across a large section of the front of the room, representing the 638 feet that the group would now consist of if adhering to HB689.  No single moment of the night illustrated the absurdity of the bill as well.

Several other great points were made by advocates of the cycling community, including one great suggestion that the pocket cycling guide from be given out with each new bike sold in the state.

Another interesting moment happened when Jim Sysfan spoke.  Mr Syfan is a local businessman and has been largely regarded as the source of getting the representatives to write the bill.  He began by apologizing to the crowd if he had gotten any of us upset.  He made a comment that resulted in a heckler from the crowd shouting rudely, trying to make a point that money was some sort of factor in Mr Sylers influence.  The heckler would not reveal; his identity when pressed, and truthfully, it was probably for the better.  Mr. Syfan continued, and was obviously very nervous in hostile territory, but tried to make a point that the reason for his involvement was because he was concerned for the safety of the cyclists.  Unfortunately he was not able to strongly make his point and ended up coming off like he was backpedaling  on his stance.

I left the meeting before it concluded, and at the time of writing this I am happy to see that  Rep. Rogers concluded that the point of the bill was to get everyone together and begin a dialogue, and that since that process has been accomplished, nothing more will be done on HB689 and the bill will be pulled in the morning.

Congratulations Georgia cycling community, you have done yourselves well!  Let’s all do our part to make the roads safer for cyclists and motorists alike. 


Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 thoughts on “Georgia Proposed Bicycle Legislation HB689 Meeting – What I Saw

  1. Katie says:

    I am a bit torn by this legislation, as a motorist and a bike rider (who was recently involved in an accident on the road), I am frustrated by the attitude of fellow cyclist that give us all a bad wrap. When I started riding I approached it like I do most other things, I studied. I learned the rules of the road, how to share with motorists and how to respect my follower cyclists and walkers. I am irritated when someone hops the line instead of drifting in to wait for a light, when a cyclists cuts across traffic. However, last month when I was merged into on my bike, and ended up in the ER with various scraps and a broken tooth while the driver went on her merry way, I wanted to scream at people, why are you mad at me for bettering myself and using alternative methods of transportation. I really do believe that we do need to improve the roads to share with cyclists and I think cyclists need to improve attitudes to share the road.

  2. marc says:

    I was also at the meeting. I noticed that Mr. Wilhite had returned to the meeting after being removed.

  3. This is Robert Wilhite. Thx for the great write-up. I actually was not thrown out for going over the 3 min, as just about everyone went over and was not thrown out like me. I was told later that I was forced to leave b/c they said if I was allowed to stay in, they would have a hard time regaining control of the crowd…..especially when everyone began to chant “Let him speak, Let him speak, Let him speak”. Obviously, my speech hit home on both sides, with hitting my intended targets in front of me while uniting those beside/behind me.

    Yes, I was allowed to come back in but I was told I could not speak (which I have a Constitutional right to), that I had to stay in the back of the room (they told me where I ‘HAD” to sit and that I could not incite the crowd in any way. Basically, sit there like a zombie. Pretty ridiculous but I am glad I got to witness the final few minutes….and most importantly, hear that the Bill would be pulled the following morning.

    BTW, I am checking to confirm that the Bill was actually pulled. You can follow any further info on my Blog ( or my Facebook page (

    Again, Thanks for a great write-up….

  4. Susan Snead says:

    I was at the meeting as well and am actually in the picture above at the bottom with the white pants and blue shirt. This was a really good and very accurate account of the meeting. Thanks for such a great write up. I have some very strong opinions as well about some of the cyclists that insist on riding as though they do not have to obey any kind of rules when they are on their bicycles. It does nothing to help our cause! I have expressed some opinions on my blog as well. I have a new website called Would love it if you would check it out. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: